Flying Eze and its trusted partners need your
permission to store and access cookies, unique identifiers, personal data, and information on your
browsing behaviour on this device. This only applies to Flying Eze. You don’t have to accept, and
you
can change your preferences at any time via the Privacy Options link at the bottom of this screen. If
you don’t accept, you may will still see some personalised ads and content.
Cookies, device identifiers, or other information can be stored or accessed on
your device for the purposes presented to you.
Ads and content can be personalised based on a profile. More data can be added
to better personalise ads and content. Ad and content performance can be
measured. Insights about audiences who saw the ads and content can be derived.
Data can be used to build or improve user experience, systems and software.
Precise geolocation and information about device characteristics can be used.
If you don’t want to accept, please select Read More option below where you can also see how and
why your data may be used. You can also see where we or our partners claim a legitimate interest and
object to the processing of your data.
B.C.’s ban on in-person religious gatherings is headed to the province’s top court.
Earlier this month, B.C. Supreme Court Chief Justice Christopher Hinkson ruled that the ban did infringe on religious rights guaranteed in the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, but that the infringement was reasonable.
Paul Jaffe, the lawyer for a group that includes a trio of Fraser Valley churches that continued to hold services through the winter, in violation of the order, said he filed a notice of appeal Wednesday with the B.C. Court of Appeal.
Jaffe said his clients never disputed that provincial health officer Dr. Bonnie Henry was being reasonable in responding to a surge in new infections with stricter health restrictions.
“What was at issue, though, is that the orders distinguish between religious and secular gatherings, a distinction which was an issue,” he said.
“And unfortunately, the judgment didn’t really address that.”
Jaffe said the province never provided evidence showing transmission was more likely in a church than in a school or a grocery store, and he said allowing people to continue to gather in those other places amounts to religious discrimination.
He also argued the ruling set a low bar for Henry’s office to show that its orders were reasonable. He said that could incentivize governments that seek to infringe on people’s rights to try and do them through bureaucrats offices.
“To give them a back-door exit from an effective constitutional challenge,” he said.
It was not immediately clear when the appellate court would hear the case.
Henry also announced plans to low limited indoor services for the major upcoming religious holidays — only to scrap that variance on Monday, amid surging new COVID-19 case numbers.