Select theme:

Search

Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

  • Home
  • News
  • Human Rights Code can’t protect anti-maskers making unproven claims: tribunal

Human Rights Code can’t protect anti-maskers making unproven claims: tribunal

Published on April 01, 2021 at 09:54 PM

VANCOUVER — A decision by the British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal says anyone denied service for refusing to wear a mask must be ready to prove they have a disability if they intend to file a complaint.

The warning is contained in a screening decision published Wednesday as tribunal member Steven Adamson addresses what he describes as a large volume of complaints alleging discrimination related to mask requirements.

Screening decisions are among the first steps in a tribunal investigation and are rarely released, but Adamson says he's publishing his findings because there have been many similar complaints since last October.

In his decision, Adamson rejects that an unnamed customer's human rights were violated when a security guard asked her to leave an unnamed store for refusing to wear a mask.

Read more: Vancouver cyclist confronts anti-masker at rally; assault charges recommended

The ruling says the woman claimed the mask order is “pointless” and masks make breathing difficult and cause anxiety, but she would not explain any physical disability that might prevent use of a mask.

In tossing out the complaint, Adamson says although the woman has reported an “adverse impact” regarding service in the store, she hasn't offered any facts about a physical or mental condition.

Read more: Anti-masker berates staff at Vancouver camera store

“The Code does not protect people who refuse to wear a mask as a matter of personal preference, because they believe wearing a mask is ‘pointless,' or because they disagree that wearing masks helps to protect the public during the pandemic,” Adamson writes.

He says the code only protects from discrimination based on certain personal characteristics, including disability, and any claim of discrimination must begin by establishing the disability interferes with mask use.

  • Share:
Flying Eze

Flying Eze

Suspect in North Vancouver stabbings due in court on Thursday
Prev Article

Suspect in North Vancouver stabbings due in court on Thursday

Next Article

Students in residences urged to move out early, most classes and exams moving online: Western University

Students in residences urged to move out early, most classes and exams moving online: Western University

Related to this topic:

Comments (0):

Be the first to write a comment.

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *