Search

Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Ikpambese: Benue Assembly takes battle to Supreme Court over removal of chief judge

Published on March 28, 2025 at 05:22 PM

The Benue State House of Assembly has resolved to seek the Supreme Court’s interpretation regarding its authority to recommend the removal of the state Chief Judge, following a bill before the House of Representatives proposing a role for the National Judicial Council, NJC, in such matters.

During its plenary session on Friday, the assembly reaffirmed its February 18, 2025, recommendation for the removal of Chief Judge Justice Maurice Ikpambese. The decision was based on a petition from the state’s Attorney General, accusing the judge of gross misconduct, abuse of office, bribery, and corruption.

However, the assembly’s recommendation was met with strong opposition from various bodies, including the Senate, the Nigerian Bar Association (NBA), and the NJC.

At Friday’s session, Speaker Chief Hyacinth Aondona Dajoh presided as the House passed a resolution to approach the Supreme Court for an interpretation of Section 292(1)(a)(ii) of the Constitution concerning the removal of a Chief Judge.

Majority Leader Saater Tiseer, who moved the motion, emphasized that despite the assembly securing a two-thirds majority to support the recommendation, it faced widespread criticism. He noted that the House of Representatives, on March 26, 2025, advanced a bill for a second reading to grant the NJC a formal role in the removal process.

Tiseer argued that the proposed bill implies that the NJC currently has no constitutional role in the removal of a Chief Judge, thereby vindicating the Benue State Assembly’s decision.

“The bill before the National Assembly confirms that the NJC has no existing role in the removal of a Chief Judge, as outlined in Section 292(1)(a)(ii) of the amended Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria,”; he stated.

The assembly agreed to promptly approach the Supreme Court for clarification on the matter to resolve the controversy surrounding its actions.

Prev Article

Kwara aviation college graduates 19 military, civilian pilots

Next Article

Vanishing spider that becomes ‘almost invisible’ found – weird white hole ‘unlike anything ever seen’ is clue it’s near

Related to this topic:

Comments (0):

Be the first to write a comment.

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *