MILLIONS of football fans are STILL sore about Diego Maradona’s infamous Hand of God knocking England out of the World Cup in 1986 – and nearly half say they will “never forgive him”;.
A poll of 2,000 lovers of the game found the Argentine ace̢۪s controversial goal topped a list of the most controversial World Cup moments that might have benefited from video replays for referees.
Other memorable moments fans believe would have benefited from VAR include Frank Lampard̢۪s clearly over-the-line shot against Germany in 2010 that wasn̢۪t given.
And Thierry Henry’s blatant – yet unpunished – handball against Ireland in in a 2009 World Cup play-off was chosen by 28 per cent.
Just under one in five (19 per cent), however, also suspect Geoff Hurst̢۪s game-changing goal in the 1966 final, which England went on to win, might not have been given had VAR been around.
The research was commissioned by Samsung UK to showcase the 2022 range of Neo QLED TVs, featuring Quantum Dot technology.
VAR analyst and former professional referee Dermot Gallagher, working with Samsung, said: “As a proud Irish man, the most controversial decision for me has to be Thierry Henry’s handball in the World Cup qualifier against the Republic of Ireland in 2009.
“With VAR and decent tech in place, the foul would have been called, bringing the tied game to penalties.â€
Other World Cup injustices football fans recall include Spain having two perfectly good goals disallowed against tournament hosts South Korea in 2002 (19 per cent).
And 21 per cent are still bitter about West Germany’s Jurgen Klinsmann diving in the 1990 final, which got the Argentine Monzón sent off.
HOW TO GET FREE BETS ON FOOTBALL
Some 63 per cent of respondents believe VAR would have eradicated most of the World Cup injustices that have taken place over the years.
But 48 say while VAR has advantages, it still has a way to go before it̢۪s a truly useful tool when it comes to refereeing matches.
The biggest drawback football fans see with VAR is that it means you don̢۪t know whether a goal can be celebrated, in case it̢۪s chalked off for some unseen infringement (28 per cent).
Another 28 per cent think it’s being used for the “wrong”; reasons – like trying to gauge if a handball was deliberate, instead of a binary decision like if a ball had crossed the line.
And 19 per cent believe that far from solving any debates, VAR actually leads to even more arguments among pundits post-game.
The study also found during a typical World Cup match, fans will disagree with a referee̢۪s decision four times.
And a staggering 36 per cent even believe they could competently referee a match at the highest level – the World Cup finals.
Spokesperson Zeena Hill, for Samsung UK, which has offered to supply the English Football Association, and FIFA World Cup, VAR departments with Neo QLED TVs to help with picture detail, said: “With recent success for the English national teams, the excitement for this year’s World Cup is bigger than ever.”;
