EVANILSON should never have received a red card against Manchester United.
The striker slipped when he challenged Moroccan international in the 70th minute of Sunday's .
Ref Peter Bankes gave a yellow card to the Brazilian — and that was the correct call, as Evanilson’s slip turned his tackle into a reckless one. It was not serious foul play.
Why on earth did VAR John Brooks get involved?
It’s a very poor decision — and Bournemouth can feel aggrieved because it changed the game and dented their European hopes.
They would have a good case to appeal the dismissal — and the three-match ban — as the incident was similar to ’ foul against last September.
The during was rescinded.
Referee Chris Kavanagh showed Fernandes a straight red but the appeal commission ruled he had made an “obvious” error.
WHAT WAS THE PREM EXPLANATION?
HERE'S the statement Prem chiefs issued to explain Evanilson's red card:
“VAR recommended an on-field review for a possible red card for the challenge by Evanilson on Mazraoui – with the challenge deemed to be two-footed with both feet off the ground, endangering the safety of the opponent.
Upon review, the referee issued a red card to Evanilson for serious foul play.”
BOURNEMOUTH CHIEF'S ANGER
CHERRIES' boss appeared astounded by his frontman's dismissal.
Iraola told Sky Sports: “Common sense. Everyone who has played football understands.
“He slips. He doesn't catch him with the leg that goes high and the consequence is a red card.
“It is another three games without playing. The repercussions for us are huge. Of course we are going to appeal. It is common sense.
“In the first half Evanilson gets a kick in the chest by . I don't think you should have a red card for this. But the VAR cuts the worst angle, the worst frame.”
