Search

Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Premier League accused of distorting the competition in favour of Arsenal in latest Man City claim

Published on April 04, 2025 at 02:17 PM

MANCHESTER CITY have accused the Premier League of distorting its rules in favour of Arsenal and three other clubs over shareholder loans.

It is the latest development in the club's long legal battle with competition chiefs over sponsorship rules originally launched last year after two Abu Dhabi sponsor deals were blocked by the league.

Arsenal players celebrating a goal.
Man City have accused Premier League financial rules of favouring Arsenal and other rivals
Pep Guardiola, Manchester City manager.
City claim the amended ATP rules are ‘discriminatory'

In February the over Associated Party Transaction rules with an independent tribunal ruling the regulations were “void and unenforceable”.

The Premier League hastily attempted to amend the ATP regulations following the verdict with City describing the move as “flawed and inadequate”.

But in a fresh challenge issued at the end of March, the champions have now claimed to an independent tribunal that , Brighton, and have all been given an unfair advantage.

According to The Times, City claim shareholders loans given to those clubs have not been treated in the same way as other ATPs like sponsorship deals with companies linked to club owners.

City now suggest the league should return to pre-2021 rules until the matters are fully resolved due to the amended league rules continuing to “discriminate” and give other clubs “differential treatment”.

The club argue the rules, “fail to meet the requirements of objectivity, precision and proportionality... and are liable to distort competition”.

City argue the Premier League should not change rules that have already been declared void and were too hasty to amend them.

They have criticised the league for claiming shareholder loans do not need to be assessed for fair market value in the same way as other APTs.

City also slammed the 50-day grace period clubs get to convert shareholder loans into equity which is argued to give clubs an unfair advantage with Profit and Sustainability Rules.

In Arsenal's case, the Cityzens claim their title rivals in the last two seasons benefited from around £259million in shareholder loans during the 2022/23 season.

Elsewhere, Everton got loans of £450m in 2022/23, Brighton £406.5m in 2021/22 and Leicester £265m in 2021/22.

City said: “This continued preferential and discriminatory treatment of shareholder loans has the object and/or effect of distorting economic competition between member clubs on affected markets.”

They added the rules, “do not eliminate, but on the contrary perpetuate the discriminatory and distortive treatment previously found by the tribunal”.

On the rule changes, the Premier League have argued the amendments are “valid and enforceable”.

The same tribunal will rule on this new challenge, which could force the league to make more changes to its financial rules.

It will also jot up more legal costs while the separate issue of City's 130 alleged breaches of financial breaches remains ongoing.

The report adds the same team of lawyers is fighting both cases for City.

Elsewhere for City, club legend when the season ends.

Prev Article

‘UFC have to give me a title shot’ – Lerone Murphy adamant he should get Ilia Topuria treatment with Josh Emmett win

Next Article

The 1% Club contestant misses out on huge jackpot after struggling with final question but could you have got it right?

Related to this topic:

Comments (0):

Be the first to write a comment.

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *