Search

Newsletter image

Subscribe to the Newsletter

Join 10k+ people to get notified about new posts, news and tips.

Do not worry we don't spam!

GDPR Compliance

We use cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. By continuing to use our site, you accept our use of cookies, Privacy Policy, and Terms of Service.

Grovelling Keir admits treatment of women’s rights campaigners like JK Rowling in trans debate was ‘clearly wrong’

Published on April 24, 2025 at 07:59 AM

GROVELLING Sir Keir Starmer has admitted the treatment of women's rights campaigners like JK Rowling in the trans debate was “clearly wrong”.

The “woman” and “sex” in the 2010 Equality Act “refer to a biological woman and biological sex”.

Prime Minister Keir Starmer speaking to children at a school.
Sir Keir Starmer welcomed the Supreme Court ruling that a woman must be defined by biology
Woman on a boat smoking a cigar and drinking a cocktail.
JK Rowling was seen puffing on a cigar and enjoying a cocktail following the Supreme Court's ruling
Kemi Badenoch speaking at Prime Minister's Questions in the House of Commons.
Tory leader Kemi Badenoch accused PM Sir Keir of having ‘no balls'

The landmark judgement was hailed as a “victory for common sense” by top politicians and feminist campaigners.

And the PM, who has , welcomed the Supreme Court ruling and said it is “time now to lower the temperature” of the debate.

But a “weather vane who twists in the wind” as she claimed he “doesn't have the balls” to express his views on gender.

And author branding him a “coward”.

Now has said the treatment of women's rights campaigners was “clearly wrong”.

A spokesman for Sir Keir told The Telegraph some women like Rowling had not been “treated appropriately”.

They said: “t is clearly the case that some of the women who have sought this legal clarity have not been treated appropriately and that is clearly wrong, and the Prime Minister always takes an approach, whether it’s this issue or to any issue, that everyone should be treated with dignity and respect, and these debates should be conducted in that manner.

“And he has welcomed the court judgment for what it is. It's a step forward.

“It's a welcome step forward, and it obviously supports the Government's position, as set out in the manifesto, to deliver single sex spaces based upon biological sex.”

At , a fired-up Ms Badenoch slammed Sir Keir for “bending the knee” to “every passing fad” as she blasted his past failure to back the protection of single-sex spaces.

She also hit out at the PM as he refused to apologise to ex-Labour MP , who was “hounded” from the party over her gender critical views.

Ms Badenoch said: “This is a question about moral courage, about doing the right thing, even when it is difficult.

“The truth is he doesn't have the balls. The Prime Minister only tells people what they want to hear.”

Meanwhile Rowling said: “Imagine being such a coward you can only muster the courage to tell the truth once the has ruled on what the truth is.”

Rowling has been a long standing advocate for women's group For Women , which she is also believed to have backed with funding.

She has also come under fire for comments made in the past towards trans people, with the author bravely standing firm in the face of online pressure.

In 2020, the esteemed author slammed the growing trend of replacing “biological sex” with “gender identity”.

Her stance, that declared “sex is real”, led to death threats, but also moulded her into a figurehead for the “gender-critical” movement.

Activists accused her of transphobia in 2020 when replying to an article with the headline: “Opinion: Creating a more equal post Covid-19 world for people who menstruate.”

She tweeted: “‘People who menstruate'. I'm sure there used to be a word for those people.

“Someone help me out. Wumben? Wimpund? Woomud?”

Her remarks led to criticism from Potter actors , , , who ignored the fact her had made them famous to launch a string of attacks.

It was Rowling's beloved group For Women Scotland which also launched a long-running legal battle with the Scottish government over how a “woman” was defined in Scottish law.

The Scottish government had argued people with gender recognition certificates (GRCs) should be protected from sex-based discrimination, meaning a transwoman would be considered a woman.

However, campaign group For Women Scotland claimed this only applied to people born as a female.

Protestors holding a banner that reads "For Women Scotland =SHEROES" outside a courthouse.
The movement was spearheaded by groups such as For Women Scotland, which Rowling is believed to have financially backed
Women celebrating a Supreme Court ruling.
Women's rights advocates celebrating the decision outside the court on Wednesday
Two women celebrating outside the Supreme Court.
The ruling was declared a ‘victory for truth' by advocates
Prev Article

Tony Allen didn’t co-pioneer Afrobeat with Fela – Femi Kuti insists

Next Article

Gerard Kennedy dead: Neighbours and The Flying Doctors star dies aged 93 after stellar career spanning five decades

Related to this topic:

Comments (0):

Be the first to write a comment.

Post Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *