Harry is convinced of a conspiracy – but security fears are HIS fault after revealing Taliban kills, expert says

PRINCE Harry is convinced of a security threat conspiracy but it's his fault after revealing the number of Taliban kills he had, an expert claimed.

, 40, has just spent two days in London appealing the decision to strip him of publicly-funded security while in UK.

The dad-of-two made a surprise visit at the High Court to launch the case against theand the Executive Committee for the Protection of Royalty and Public Figures (Ravec).

And following the hearing, Harry claimed axing his taxpayer-funded police protection wa

The Duke also moaned his “worst fears have been confirmed” by secret evidence he heard in court.

But some royal experts have claimed his fears stem from his own actions.

In his 2023 memoir , Harry disclosed how he killedduring his deployment to Afghanistan.

He described viewing the fighters as

It who raged the Duke should be brought before an “international court” for his “crimes” .

Now Harry has been as he appealed against the withdrawal of his publicly-funded security while in the UK.

Heclaimed he was “singled out” after his round-the-clock royal protection was stripped in the wake of.

He also attempted to suethe Home Officebecause it refused to spend taxpayers'moneyon bodyguards after he left the.

But experts have cast doubt over his fears after , , and just

Journalists Esther Krakue and Bronte Coy sat down alongside royal correspondent Jack Royston to discuss the issue.

They spoke with Flying Eze's Royal Editor Matt Wilkinson on the

Ms Krakue said: “It was interesting hearing the Home Office's case, because they argued that who better qualified to actually assessing Harry, than the head of Ravik, who actually oversees these matters.

“He [Harry] is citing the fact that he's been singled out for inferior treatment, but this is a very unique case. No one's ever done this before.

“So I think him making this case that, ‘oh, you're treating me badly', okay, by what metric?

“Where in history do we have cases like this to reference against? And that's the real problem.

“It is also, in terms of public opinion, very strange, because this is someone who went to Colombia, who went to Nigeria, who's currently in Ukraine.

“This idea that somehow Britain is far less safe for him when he's trotting around with his wife in these sorts of countries is baffling.

“And also, just from a technical perspective as well, I don't think it was very wise for him to put his Taliban kill count in his book, because now we know that he has some sort of fatwa against him and he's saying he tried to make the case that this is one of the things that's showing that my life is at risk.

“Well, that's something of your own doing. And you feel comfortable going to like , for example, in a country where people can readily handle guns.

“You're not scared of getting shot in a supermarket, but you're scared of being in the UK where the most people can get at you is a baton and a knife.”

Jack Royston also highlighted how senior members of the Royal Family require more protection because they attend public, scheduled events.

These present more opportunity for terrorists to plan their attacks, he explained.

“You need protection when you attend royal events, but you don't need it when you're going to see your friends,” added Mr Royston.

“You know, when you're doing something privately, you don't need a police officer with you.”

And Bronte Coy raised the question of Harry attending the two day hearing when no one expected him to.

This follows Harry yesterday to meet with war victims and veterans.

The Duke of Sussex made the unannounced trip as part of his ongoing work with wounded veterans, a spokesperson said.

He went to the Superhuman Center, an orthopedic clinic in , that treats and rehabilitates wounded military personnel and civilians.

The dad of two saw how the services are rolled out in a war-torn country.

The center provides prosthetics, reconstructive surgery and psychological help free of charge.

Harry, who served 10 years in the British Army, has worked tirelessly on providing support for injured veterans since founding the.

But the trip sparked backlash from some for moaning about security and then visiting a war ravaged country.

Royal author Phil Dampier told Flying Eze he thought it was “ridiculous” while Hugo Vickers said he was “torn”.