Flying Eze and its trusted partners need your
permission to store and access cookies, unique identifiers, personal data, and information on your
browsing behaviour on this device. This only applies to Flying Eze. You don’t have to accept, and
you
can change your preferences at any time via the Privacy Options link at the bottom of this screen. If
you don’t accept, you may will still see some personalised ads and content.
Cookies, device identifiers, or other information can be stored or accessed on
your device for the purposes presented to you.
Ads and content can be personalised based on a profile. More data can be added
to better personalise ads and content. Ad and content performance can be
measured. Insights about audiences who saw the ads and content can be derived.
Data can be used to build or improve user experience, systems and software.
Precise geolocation and information about device characteristics can be used.
If you don’t want to accept, please select Read More option below where you can also see how and
why your data may be used. You can also see where we or our partners claim a legitimate interest and
object to the processing of your data.
The European medicines watchdog expects to hold a press conference this week updating the public on its review of rare blood clotting cases in people who have received the AstraZeneca COVID-19 vaccine, a spokeswoman said on Tuesday.
In an emailed response to questions, a spokeswoman for the European Medicines Agency said its pharmaceuticals risk assessment committee “had not reached a conclusion” in its current review of the vaccine’s safety, and it expects to hold a press briefing “as soon as the review is finalized,” either on April 7 or April 8.
The regulator has consistently said the benefits outweigh the risks as it investigates 44 reports of an extremely rare brain clotting ailment known as cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (CVST) out of 9.2 million people in the European Economic Area who have received the AstraZeneca vaccine.
The World Health Organization has also backed the vaccine.
As has Canada.
The country’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) has since recommended the vaccine not be given to those under the age of 55 due to blood clot concerns — but out of sheer caution. However, the agency stands by the vaccine for those above that age, saying the benefits still clearly outweigh the risk.
To date, no cases of these events have been reported in Canada.
Earlier Tuesday, the chair of the vaccine evaluation team at the EMA, Marco Cavaleri, reportedly told an Italian daily, Il Messaggero, that there is a link between the vaccine and very rare blood clots in the brain, though the possible causes are still unknown.
Cavaleri said he was speaking of his own opinion. He provided no evidence to support his comment.
The EMA refuted that conclusion soon after, saying no determination had been reached in the vaccine’s safety review.
An AstraZeneca spokesman declined to comment on the matter to Reuters.
Last week, the EMA said that its review had, at present not identified any specific risk factors, such as age, gender or a previous medical history of clotting disorders, for these very rare events. A causal link with the vaccine is not proven, but is possible and further analysis is continuing, the agency said.
A high proportion among the reported cases affected young and middle-aged women but that did not lead EMA to conclude this cohort was particularly at risk from AstraZeneca’s shot.
Some countries, including France, Germany and the Netherlands, have suspending the use of the vaccine in younger people while the investigations continue.
Scientists are exploring several possibilities that might explain the extremely rare brain blood clots that occurred in individuals in the days and weeks after receiving the AstraZeneca vaccine.
European investigators have put forward one theory that the vaccine triggers an unusual antibody in some rare cases; others are trying to understand whether the cases are linked with birth control pills.
But many scientists say there is no definitive evidence and it is not clear whether or why AstraZeneca’s vaccine would cause an issue not shared by other vaccines that target a similar part of the coronavirus.